0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÏ Áö¿ª»çȸ ³ëÀÎÀÇ °Ç°­ÁõÁø »ýÈ°¾ç½Ä, ÀÚ¾ÆÁ¸Áß°¨ ¹× »çȸÀûÁöÁö °ü°è¿¬±¸

A Study on Self-esteem and Social Support, Health-promoting Lifestyle of the Elderly

Áö¿ª»çȸ°£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2003³â 14±Ç 1È£ p.144 ~ 156
KMID : 0607720030140010144
¹Ú¼ø¿Á ( Park Sun-Ok ) - ¿©ÁÖ´ëÇÐ °£È£°ú

±è¾ÖÁ¤ ( Kim Ae-Jung ) - ¿©ÁÖ´ëÇÐ °£È£°ú
¹éÈÆÁ¤ ( Paik Hoon-Jung ) - ¿©ÁÖ´ëÇÐ °£È£°ú
±èÃá¹Ì ( Kim Chun-Mi ) - ¿©ÁÖ´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú
±èÁ¤¼÷ ( Kim Jung-Sug ) - ¿©ÁÖ´ëÇÐ °£È£°ú
ÃÖ¼ø¿µ ( Choi Soon-Young ) - ¿©ÁÖ´ëÇÐ °£È£°ú
¹®ÁøÇÏ ( Moon Jin-Ha ) - ¿©ÁÖ´ëÇÐ °£È£°ú

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the relationship between the self-esteem, social support and health promoting lifestyle of the elderly in a community. The sample consisted of 147 elderly, and data were collected from September 1 to October 15, 2001. The instrument of this study was a structured questionnaire including Health Promoting Lifestyle (47 items), Social Support(18 items), Self-Esteem(10 items), Socio-demographic Characteristics. Analysis of the data was done by use of descriptive statistics, ANOVA, Pearson Correlation Coefficient.

The results of this study are as follows:
1. The degrees of self-esteem of the elderly were mean score 25¡¾2.98 points ,sociodemographic characteristics containing meaningful difference with self-esteem was not significant. 2. The degrees of social support by elderly were
mean score 55.03¡¾9.60 points and social support according to the socio-demographic characteristics showed meaning difference in family structure with ¡¸off spring¡¹(F=8.50, p=.000), health status¡¸good¡¹(t=2.19, p=.030), smoking¡¸below 1 packet daily¡¹ (F=4.88, p=.009). 3. The degrees of health enhancing lifestyle by elderly were mean score 113.61¡¾20.12 points and health enhancing lifestyle according to the socio-demographic characteristics showed meaning difference in education level ¡¸middle school and above¡¹(F=6.37 p=.002), occupation before retirement ¡¸profession, technician, employee of company, education¡¹ (F=5.00, p=.003), health status¡¸good¡¹ (t=3.14, p=0.002), exercise¡¸weekly 2-3¡¹ (F=4.31, p=.006), drinking ¡¸weekly 1¡¹ (F=2.74, p=.046). 4. The item mean score of personal relationship support field in health enhancing lifestyle were 2.90¡¾.60 points, item mean scores of exercise and nutrition were 2.26¡¾.39 points, item mean scores of stress managing field were 2.25¡¾.49 points, item mean scores of health responsible field were 2.14¡¾.61 points. 5. The relationship between self-esteem and health enhancing lifestyle revealed a significant correlation(r=.169, p=.041), but self-esteem and social support, showed no significant correlation, and health enhancing lifestyle and social support, revealed a significant correlation(r=.654, p=.001).
KeyWords
ÀÚ¾ÆÁ¸Áß°¨, »çȸÀûÁöÁö, °Ç°­ÁõÁø»ýÈ°¾ç½Ä
Self-esteem and social support, Health-promoting lifestyle
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed